Paul North: Likeness and Inertia

We will discuss the old concept “becoming” and how we could possibly see it as an effect of likenesses. A corrolary question is, then, how likenesses emerge and/or change. If an apple is like an orange in being a tree fruit, how can the apple at the same time or subsequently be like a planet, in being affected by gravity (Newton’s aperçu)? Wittgenstein calls this question “hard as granite.” What does it mean for something to be like two different things? Further, under what conditions might a thing’s likenesses change? The question cannot be answered as Wittgenstein posed it, however; individual examples or atomic instances cannot explain the emergence of likenesses. You need a view of the entire system of likenesses and the strange non-force that governs it, inertia, and for that Henri Bergson’s argument in Matter and Memory is useful.

 

 

Bizarre-Privileged Entities in the Universe: The Logic of Likeness. NY: Zone Books, 2019.
“Absolute Teacher, Sloterdijk.” Boudary2. Vol 43 no. 2. Spring 2016
The Yield: Kafka’s Atheological Reformation. CA: Stanford UP, 2015.
“Apparent Critique: Inferences from a Benjaminian Sketch.” Diacritics 40.1. Spring 2013. Cornell University Press.